2025/2026
| Player | Rating | Min | Goals | Assists | Shots | Passes | Tackles | Duels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 77' | 0 | 0 | 3/4 | 20(65%) | 1 | 3/6 | ||
| 26' | 0 | 0 | 0/2 | 8(38%) | 1 | 3/4 | ||
| 90' | 0 | 0 | 0/2 | 61(72%) | 1 | 5/7 | ||
| 64' | 0 | 0 | 1/1 | 5(80%) | 1 | 3/5 | ||
| 65' | 0 | 0 | - | 23(57%) | 2 | 3/4 | ||
| 90' | 0 | 0 | - | 20(50%) | 2 | 4/6 | ||
| 25' | 0 | 0 | - | 15(80%) | 1 | 1/2 | ||
| 90' | 0 | 0 | - | 55(76%) | 2 | 4/8 | ||
| 90' | 0 | 0 | - | 16(63%) | - | 1/3 | ||
| 13' | 0 | 0 | 1/1 | 6(100%) | - | 1/3 | ||
| 90' | 0 | 0 | 0/1 | 40(55%) | 2 | 3/9 | ||
| 77' | 0 | 0 | - | 16(56%) | 1 | 5/12 | ||
| 13' | 0 | 0 | - | 13(46%) | 1 | 1/3 | ||
| 90' | 0 | 0 | - | 50(78%) | - | 1/3 | ||
| 90' | 0 | 0 | - | 26(85%) | - | 0/1 |
| Team | Run | Unbeaten | Winless | Scored in | Conceded in | Last-5 pts | Last-5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lens W | D1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 5/15 | 5-6 |
| Fleury 91 W | W1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6/15 | 3-5 |
Computed over each team's last 15 finished games before kickoff.
Aggregated from 3 finished meetings in the GioScore fixtures corpus.
| Date | Home | Score | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-01 | Fleury 91 W | 4-0 | Lens W |
| 2024-08-23 | Fleury 91 W | 2-0 | Lens W |
| 2022-08-06 | Lens W | 1-4 | Fleury 91 W |
| Team | Pos | Pld | Pts | GD | Form | Form rank | Form vs pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lens W | 10 | 22 | 16 | -27 | LLWLL | 11 | -1 |
| Fleury 91 W | 5 | 22 | 33 | 6 | LLWLD | 8 | -3 |
Form rank = league-wide rank by points from the last 5 league games; "Form vs pos" > 0 means over-performing the table.
Figures computed from the GioScore results database · data cutoff: kickoff 2026-02-07
On the table this was a mismatch: Fleury 91 W (5th, 33 pts) held a 17-point advantage over Lens W (10th, 16 pts).
Fleury 91 W: Cindy Caputo (63'), Emelyne Laurent (90')
Possession: Lens W 49% · Fleury 91 W 51% · Total shots: 11-9 · On target: 5-3 · Corners: 6-3
