2025/2026
| Player | Rating | Min | Goals | Assists | Shots | Passes | Tackles | Duels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90' | 0 | 1 | 3/7 | 36(91%) | 1 | 6/9 | ||
| 90' | 0 | 0 | 3/4 | 23(91%) | 2 | 7/13 | ||
 Ângelo MF | 90' | 0 | 0 | 3/4 | 46(83%) | 3 | 8/12 | |
| 90' | 1 | 0 | 1/1 | 42(88%) | 1 | 3/6 | ||
 Bento GK | 90' | 0 | 0 | - | 19(89%) | - | - | |
| 90' | 0 | 0 | 0/1 | 45(83%) | 1 | 2/6 | ||
| 64' | 0 | 0 | 0/5 | 11(55%) | 3 | 4/7 | ||
| 64' | 0 | 0 | - | 29(83%) | 1 | 2/3 | ||
| 90' | 0 | 0 | 0/1 | 39(79%) | - | 3/6 | ||
| 90' | 0 | 0 | 0/1 | 48(77%) | 2 | 5/10 | ||
| 26' | 0 | 0 | - | 17(88%) | - | 1/1 | ||
| 90' | 0 | 0 | - | 48(79%) | 1 | 4/12 | ||
| 26' | 0 | 0 | - | 17(82%) | - | 1/4 | ||
| 10' | 0 | 0 | - | 2(100%) | 1 | 2/3 | ||
| 10' | 0 | 0 | 0/1 | 4(100%) | - | - | ||
| - | 1' | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - |
| Team | Run | Unbeaten | Winless | Scored in | Conceded in | Last-5 pts | Last-5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al Nassr | W12 | 12 | 0 | 15 | 1 | 15/15 | 15-1 |
| NEOM SC | L1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7/15 | 4-4 |
Computed over each team's last 15 finished games before kickoff.
| Team | Pos | Pld | Pts | GD | Form | Form rank | Form vs pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al Nassr | 1 | 34 | 86 | 63 | WLWDW | 4 | -3 |
| NEOM SC | 8 | 34 | 45 | -5 | DDWLD | 8 | 0 |
Form rank = league-wide rank by points from the last 5 league games; "Form vs pos" > 0 means over-performing the table.
Figures computed from the GioScore results database · data cutoff: kickoff 2026-03-07
On the table this was a mismatch: Al Nassr (1st, 86 pts) held a 41-point advantage over NEOM SC (8th, 45 pts).
Al Nassr arrived on a run of 12 straight wins, having scored in 15 consecutive games. The five-game form split read 15/15 points for Al Nassr against 7/15 for NEOM SC.
Al Nassr: Mohamed Simakan (90')
Possession: Al Nassr 57% · NEOM SC 43% · Total shots: 25-6 · On target: 10-2 · Corners: 8-1
