STATS
| rating | goal | assists | total... | passes | player.tabs.stats.lb_ap | key... | duels won | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vs![]() | 66 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 26 | 16 | 0 | 6 |
vs![]() | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
vs![]() | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
vs![]() | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
vs![]() | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
03 Jan 26NS
14 Nov 25NS
09 Nov 25FT
40
| Club | Season | lineup... | match... | yellow... | red... | mins | assists... |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024/2025 | 33 | 33 | 6 | 1 | 2802 | 0.03 | |
| 2025 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0.00 | |
| 2025/2026 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 208 | 0.33 | |
| Total | 36 | 38 | 9 | 1 | 3022 | 0.05 |
OPPONENT
| Opponent | M | W | D | L | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- Current market value
- Highest transfer fee
- Transfer fee
Performance Overview
74%
Passes accuracy
3
Keys passes
77.0%
Minutes per game
Defending
Clean sheets-
Interceptions per game-
Tackles per game-
Possession won8
Dribbled past per game-
Clearances per game-
Error led to shot-
Error led to goal-
Penalty committed
Player Information
Age
28
Born: 26/05/1997
Height
Position
M
Midfielder
Bradley Lyons played in 2 teams:
Kilmarnock, Northern IrelandWhen and where played Bradley Lyons?
Bradley Lyons (Northern Ireland) currently plays for Premiership club Kilmarnock. Bradley Lyons is 28 years old (26/05/1997) and he is tall.
How many Salary earn Bradley Lyons per year?
Bradley Lyons receive a Salary £35,880 per year
In this profile you will can follow the player data information, statistics, career history and performance of Bradley Lyons in Kilmarnock matches.
Show more ›››
vs








