STATS
| rating | goal | assists | total... | passes | player.tabs.stats.lb_ap | key... | duels won | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vs![]() | 66 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 2 |
vs![]() | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
vs![]() | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
vs![]() | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
05 Jan 26NS
17 Dec 25FT
01
14 Dec 25FT
33
| Club | Season | lineup... | match... | yellow... | red... | mins | goals... |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024/2025 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 304 | 0.33 | |
| 2025/2026 | 11 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 950 | 0.40 | |
| Total | 15 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1254 | 0.38 |
OPPONENT
| Opponent | M | W | D | L | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- Current market value
- Highest transfer fee
- Transfer fee
Performance Overview
0.4
Goals per game average
3.5
Shots per goals average
70.4%
Minutes per game
Defending
Clean sheets-
Interceptions per game-
Tackles per game-
Possession won49
Dribbled past per game-
Clearances per game-
Error led to shot-
Error led to goal-
Penalty committed
Player Information
Age
21
Born: 18/02/2004
Height
Position
F
Attacker
Felipe Augusto da Silva played in 2 teams:
Cercle Brugge, TrabzonsporWhen and where played Felipe Augusto da Silva?
Felipe Augusto da Silva (Brazil) currently plays for Pro League club Cercle Brugge. Felipe Augusto da Silva is 21 years old (18/02/2004) and he is tall.
How many Salary earn Felipe Augusto da Silva per year?
Felipe Augusto da Silva receive a Salary £9,880 per year
In this profile you will can follow the player data information, statistics, career history and performance of Felipe Augusto da Silva in Cercle Brugge matches.
Show more ›››
vs




