STATS
| rating | goal | assists | total... | passes | player.tabs.stats.lb_ap | key... | duels won | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vs![]() | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
20 Dec 25FT
23
28 Oct 25FT
42
24 Oct 25FT
32
| Club | Season | lineup... | match... | yellow... | red... | mins | assists... |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022/2023 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 450 | 0.20 | |
| 2022/2023 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 0.00 | |
| 2022/2023 | 26 | 26 | 2 | 0 | 2281 | 0.00 | |
| 2023/2024 | 38 | 41 | 3 | 0 | 3089 | 0.12 | |
| 2024/2025 | 8 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 987 | 0.04 | |
| 2025/2026 | 4 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 536 | 0.06 | |
| Total | 82 | 116 | 6 | 0 | 7419 | 0.07 |
OPPONENT
| Opponent | M | W | D | L | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- Current market value
- Highest transfer fee
- Transfer fee
Performance Overview
77%
Passes accuracy
18
Keys passes
37.2%
Minutes per game
Defending
Clean sheets-
Interceptions per game-
Tackles per game-
Possession won30
Dribbled past per game-
Clearances per game-
Error led to shot-
Error led to goal-
Penalty committed
Player Information
Age
22
Born: 13/06/2003
Height
Position
M
Midfielder
Fedde De Jong played in 5 teams:
AZ, AZ U19, Jong AZ, SC Cambuur, De GraafschapWhen and where played Fedde De Jong?
Fedde De Jong (Netherlands) currently plays for Eerste Divisie club SC Cambuur. Fedde De Jong is 22 years old (13/06/2003) and he is tall.
How many Salary earn Fedde De Jong per year?
Fedde De Jong receive a Salary £29,120 per year
In this profile you will can follow the player data information, statistics, career history and performance of Fedde De Jong in SC Cambuur matches.
Show more ›››
vs

