2025/2026| Team | Games | Run | Unbeaten | Winless | Scored in | Conceded in | Last-5 pts | Last-5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiryat Yam SC | 15 | L2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4/15 | 3-6 |
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | 15 | D2 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 6/15 | 8-7 |
Computed over each team's finished games before kickoff — see the Games column for the sample behind each row.
Aggregated from 2 finished meetings (2025-11-28 – 2026-04-10) in the GioScore fixtures corpus.
| Date | Home | Score | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-10 | Kiryat Yam SC | 2-2 | Maccabi Petah Tikva |
| 2025-11-28 | Maccabi Petah Tikva | 3-2 | Kiryat Yam SC |
| Team | Pos | Pld | Pts | GD | Form | Form rank | Form vs pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiryat Yam SC | 6 | 30 | 46 | 6 | DLDWL | 15 | -9 |
| Maccabi Petah Tikva | 1 | 30 | 60 | 35 | WWDDD | 6 | -5 |
Form rank = league-wide rank by points from the last 5 league games; "Form vs pos" > 0 means over-performing the table.
Figures computed from the GioScore results database · data cutoff: kickoff 2026-05-25
The table read 6th (Kiryat Yam SC, 46 pts) against 1st (Maccabi Petah Tikva, 60 pts), 14 points apart. The last five rounds placed Kiryat Yam SC no better than 15th for form, against 6th in the standings. In league terms the two rates read 1.43/1.23 for Kiryat Yam SC and 2.23/1.07 for Maccabi Petah Tikva (scored/conceded per game); the competition average is 1.34.
On the scoreboard, it was 0-0 at the break, and no goals arrived after the restart: 0-0 the final score.
