2025| Team | Games | Run | Unbeaten | Winless | Scored in | Conceded in | Last-5 pts | Last-5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HJK U20 | 15 | L1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 7/15 | 7-7 |
| TPS U20 | 15 | L1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 12/15 | 24-7 |
Computed over each team's finished games before kickoff — see the Games column for the sample behind each row.
Aggregated from 2 finished meetings (2021-10-02 – 2024-08-04) in the GioScore fixtures corpus.
| Date | Home | Score | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-04 | TPS U20 | 1-0 | HJK U20 |
| 2021-10-02 | TPS U20 | 2-2 | HJK U20 |
| Team | Pos | Pld | Pts | GD | Form | Form rank | Form vs pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HJK U20 | 4 | 19 | 36 | 38 | WWDWD | 25 | -21 |
| TPS U20 | 3 | 11 | 18 | 10 | DWLWW | 6 | -3 |
Form rank = league-wide rank by points from the last 5 league games; "Form vs pos" > 0 means over-performing the table.
Figures computed from the GioScore results database · data cutoff: kickoff 2025-10-04
On the table this was a mismatch: HJK U20 (4th, 36 pts) held an 18-point advantage over TPS U20 (3rd, 18 pts). HJK U20 ranked just 25th in the league on five-round form despite their 4th table position. Per game in the league, HJK U20 were scoring 3.42 and conceding 1.42, TPS U20 2.45 and 1.55, against a competition average of 2.3 goals per team per game.
