2025| Team | Games | Run | Unbeaten | Winless | Scored in | Conceded in | Last-5 pts | Last-5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCV U20 | 6 | L2 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2/15 | 5-13 |
| MP U20 | 15 | W1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 3/15 | 7-30 |
Computed over each team's finished games before kickoff — see the Games column for the sample behind each row.
| Team | Pos | Pld | Pts | GD | Form | Form rank | Form vs pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCV U20 | 12 | 11 | 4 | -28 | LLLWL | 29 | -17 |
| MP U20 | 6 | 18 | 25 | 9 | LWDWL | 25 | -19 |
Form rank = league-wide rank by points from the last 5 league games; "Form vs pos" > 0 means over-performing the table.
Figures computed from the GioScore results database · data cutoff: kickoff 2025-08-31
21 points separated the sides: MP U20 6th on 25, FCV U20 12th on 4. MP U20 had been under-performing their position — 25th on five-round form against 6th in the table. In league terms the two rates read 1.18/3.73 for FCV U20 and 2.17/1.67 for MP U20 (scored/conceded per game); the competition average is 2.3.
5 games without a win framed FCV U20's arrival.
