- Possession
- 50%50%
- Shots · on target in brackets
- 12 (7)14 (6)
- Corners
- 132
- Table · 11 v 14 pts
- 7th6th → 4th
3. DivisionMatchday 8ALPI Arena Næsby
This meeting
Match strip & events
NÆS 1–1 FCH1′HT90′FC Helsingør on top 55 of 90 min · NÆS 48% · FCH 52% pressure · peaks NÆS 66′, FCH 85′
- Full time 1–1
- Marc Birkelund1–1Goal
- Mads Jørgensen1–0Goal
- Half-time 0–0
Season comparison
as the teams came into the match- Goal markets & scoring rates · 15 games each
- 3.93Goals per game (both sides)3.6
- 80%Over 1.587%
- 73%Over 2.573%
- 53%Over 3.547%
- 47%Both teams scored80%
- 33%Clean sheets20%
- 27%Failed to score0%
- Næsby at home v FC Helsingør away
- 9Played7
- 5Won2
- 2Drawn3
- 2Lost2
- 24-12Goals (for-against)15-13
- 1.89Points per game1.29
- 67%Over 2.586%
- 33%Clean sheets0%
- 1st half vs 2nd half scoring · 15 v 14 games
- 16-91st-half goals (for-against)11-11
- 23-112nd-half goals (for-against)15-11
- 59%Goals after half-time58%
- 80%Goal before half-time79%
- 6-6-3Half-time W-D-L5-3-6
Matchday 8
3. Division · the other 5 games- Holbæk B&I
5–2
Ringsted - Frem
3–1
Ishøj - Vanløse
1–2
Hørsholm-Usserød - Sundby
2–0
Holstebro - Brønshøj
5–1
ASA Aarhus
What stands out
- 4thfrom 6th
FC Helsingør moved from 6th to 4th in the 3. Division table with this result.13 → 14 points after 8 matches; order by points, goal difference, goals scored.
- 0–0half-time
The match stood at 0–0 at half-time before 1–1 after the break (1–1 full time).
Table after full time
3. Division 2026/2027| # | Team | P | W-D-L | Goals | GD | Pts | Before |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | 6-1-1 | 23:12 | +11 | 19 | 1st | |
| 2 | 8 | 5-2-1 | 16:8 | +8 | 17 | 3rd ▲1 | |
| 3 | 8 | 4-3-1 | 14:8 | +6 | 15 | 2nd ▼1 | |
| 4 | 8 | 4-2-2 | 12:10 | +2 | 14 | 6th ▲2 | |
| 5 | 8 | 4-1-3 | 15:15 | 0 | 13 | 5th | |
| 6 | 8 | 4-1-3 | 11:11 | 0 | 13 | 4th ▼2 | |
| 7 | 8 | 3-2-3 | 14:13 | +1 | 11 | 7th | |
| 8 | 8 | 2-3-3 | 16:16 | 0 | 9 | 9th ▲1 | |
| 9 | 8 | 2-2-4 | 16:15 | +1 | 8 | 8th ▼1 | |
| 10 | 8 | 2-1-5 | 11:15 | -4 | 7 | 10th | |
| 11 | 8 | 1-1-6 | 4:16 | -12 | 4 | 11th | |
| 12 | 8 | 1-1-6 | 10:23 | -13 | 4 | 12th |
- Næsby
- 7th10 → 11 pts
- FC Helsingør
- 6th → 4th13 → 14 pts
Form
last 10 matches of each side, all competitions, before kick-off- 2-1W1 Aug
- 3-0W4 Aug
- 0-3L8 Aug
- 0-0D15 Aug
- 5-1W22 Aug
- 5-0W25 Aug
- 2-3L29 Aug
- 4-3W5 Sep
- 0-1L13 Sep
- 2-3L16 Sep
5-1-4goals 23:151.60pts/game
Bar: goals scored.
Score: own goals first.Pts/game: green ≥ 2.0 · blue ≥ 1.5 · amber ≥ 1.0 · red below
- 2-2D19 Jul
- 2-2D31 Jul
- 4-1W4 Aug
- 3-2W8 Aug
- 1-0W14 Aug
- 1-2L22 Aug
- 2-5L25 Aug
- 1-0W28 Aug
- 1-2L4 Sep
- 2-1W13 Sep
5-2-3goals 19:171.70pts/game
latest 5
- H
Sundby2–1 - A
Brønshøj1–2 - H
Ishøj1–0 - H
Hørsholm-Usserød2–5 - A
Holstebro1–2
Match info
- Competition
- 3. Division
- Season
- 2026/2027 · Matchday 8 of 22
- Kick-off
- Venue
- ALPI Arena Næsby, Odense
- Capacity
- 4,500 · grass
- Weather
- 18 °C · broken clouds · humidity 89%
- FCH coach
- René Skovdahl Hansen
Match summary
Næsby and FC Helsingør drew 1-1 in the 3. Division, Regular Season.
Before kickoff, Næsby sat 7th on 10 points, while FC Helsingør were 6th on 13 points.
Goals came from Mads Jørgensen (67') for Næsby and Marc Birkelund (85') for FC Helsingør.
Næsby — live results and scheduleFC Helsingør — live results and scheduleHow we calculate this
Team stats
10 figures- 50%Possession50%
- 12Shots14
- 7Shots on target6
- 13Corners2
- 1Yellow cards3
All 10 stats
- Attack
- 62Attacks70
- 37Dangerous attacks49
- 58%Shot accuracy43%
- 5Shots off target8
- Other
- 5Substitutions5
Expected vs happened
as of kick-off40%Model · draw 24%36%
- Projected goals
- 1.65 – 1.56total 3.21 · from goals per game before kick-off
- Most likely scores
- 1–1 10.4%2–1 8.6%1–2 8.1%
| Outcome | Model | Happened |
|---|---|---|
| Næsby win | 40% | No |
| Draw | 24% | Yes |
| FC Helsingør win | 36% | No |
| Over 1.5 goals | 83% | Yes |
| Over 2.5 goals | 62% | No |
| Over 3.5 goals | 40% | No |
| Both teams to score | 64% | Yes |
| Næsby clean sheet | 21% | No |
| FC Helsingør clean sheet | 19% | No |
Updated