| Team | Games | Run | Unbeaten | Winless | Scored in | Conceded in | Last-5 pts | Last-5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bikita Minerals | 15 | L1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9/15 | 3-3 |
| Scotland Mabvuku | 15 | W2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7/15 | 4-4 |
Computed over each team's finished games before kickoff — see the Games column for the sample behind each row.
| Team | Pos | Pld | Pts | GD | Form | Form rank | Form vs pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bikita Minerals | 16 | 34 | 37 | -13 | LWLDL | 16 | 0 |
| Scotland Mabvuku | 1 | 34 | 69 | 27 | WWWDW | 1 | 0 |
Form rank = league-wide rank by points from the last 5 league games; "Form vs pos" > 0 means over-performing the table.
Figures computed from the GioScore results database · data cutoff: kickoff 2025-07-24
The table gap was wide: 32 points between Scotland Mabvuku (1st, 69 pts) and Bikita Minerals (16th, 37 pts). Per game in the league, Bikita Minerals were scoring 0.74 and conceding 1.12, Scotland Mabvuku 1.38 and 0.59, against a competition average of 0.86 goals per team per game.
Half-time and full-time told different stories: it was 0-0 at the break, before 1 more goal closed it at 0-1.
