STATS
| rating | goal | assists | total... | passes | key... | duels won | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
vs![]() | 5.8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28 | 0 | 4 |
18 Nov 24FT
40
24 Mar 24FT
00
02 Jul 23FT
50
| Club | Season | lineup... | match... | yellow... | red... | mins | goals... |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016/2017 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 77 | 0.00 | |
| 2017/2018 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 232 | 0.00 | |
| 2017/2018 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 393 | 0.00 | |
| 2021/2022 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 180 | 0.00 | |
| 2024/2025 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 99 | 0.00 | |
| Total | 14 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 981 | 0.00 |
OPPONENT
| Opponent | M | W | D | L | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- Current market value
- Highest transfer fee
- Transfer fee
Performance Overview
-
Fouls per game
0.6
Yellow cards per game
22.0%
Minutes per game
Passes
Assists1
Touches0
Big chances created-
Key passes0.00
Accurate per game0.00
Acc. own half-
Acc. opposition half-
Acc. long balls-
Acc. chipped passes-
Acc. crosses0%
Attacking
Goals0
Scoring frequency0
Goals per game0.00
Shots per game0.00
Shots on target per game0.00
Player Information
Age
31
Born: 24/02/1994
Height
175
Position
Defender
R. Hanley played in 4 teams:
Blackburn Rovers, Northampton Town, Halifax Town, St. Kitts and NevisWhen and where played R. Hanley?
R. Hanley (England) currently plays for club St. Kitts and Nevis. R. Hanley is 31 years old (24/02/1994) and he is 175 tall.
How many Salary earn R. Hanley per year?
R. Hanley receive a Salary per year
In this profile you will can follow the player data information, statistics, career history and performance of R. Hanley in St. Kitts and Nevis matches.
Show more ›››
vs









