2008/2009| Team | Games | Run | Unbeaten | Winless | Scored in | Conceded in | Last-5 pts | Last-5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tersana | 7 | D1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3/15 | 2-5 |
| Zamalek | 11 | D1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 4/15 | 7-8 |
Computed over each team's finished games before kickoff — see the Games column for the sample behind each row.
| Team | Pos | Pld | Pts | GD | Form | Form rank | Form vs pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tersana | 15 | 30 | 24 | -16 | LDLLD | 15 | 0 |
| Zamalek | 6 | 30 | 42 | 5 | WDLDW | 3 | +3 |
Form rank = league-wide rank by points from the last 5 league games; "Form vs pos" > 0 means over-performing the table.
Figures computed from the GioScore results database · data cutoff: kickoff 2009-02-27
On paper the standings were lopsided — Zamalek 6th with 42 points, Tersana 15th with 24, 18 apart. Against a league average of 1.21 goals per team per game, Tersana ran at 0.97 scored and 1.5 conceded, Zamalek at 1.13 and 0.97.
Tersana had not won in 7 games.
On the scoreboard, it was 0-0 at the break, and no goals arrived after the restart: 0-0 the final score.
