2009/2010| Team | Games | Run | Unbeaten | Winless | Scored in | Conceded in | Last-5 pts | Last-5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rothwell Town | 15 | L1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4/15 | 5-6 |
| Burnham | 5 | W1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 9/15 | 9-10 |
Computed over each team's finished games before kickoff — see the Games column for the sample behind each row.
| Team | Pos | Pld | Pts | GD | Form | Form rank | Form vs pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rothwell Town | 18 | 42 | 41 | -27 | LWLLL | 17 | +1 |
| Burnham | 3 | 42 | 87 | 24 | DLDWW | 9 | -6 |
Form rank = league-wide rank by points from the last 5 league games; "Form vs pos" > 0 means over-performing the table.
Figures computed from the GioScore results database · data cutoff: kickoff 2010-02-13
On the table this was a mismatch: Burnham (3rd, 87 pts) held a 46-point advantage over Rothwell Town (18th, 41 pts). Recent form told a different story for Burnham: only 9th in the league over the last five rounds despite sitting 3rd. Scoring rates set the scale: Rothwell Town 1.26 scored and 1.9 conceded per game, Burnham 1.6 and 1.02, with the league averaging 1.58.
