2008/2009| Team | Games | Run | Unbeaten | Winless | Scored in | Conceded in | Last-5 pts | Last-5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frem | 8 | L1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10/15 | 8-7 |
| Amager | 13 | L12 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0/15 | 0-15 |
Computed over each team's finished games before kickoff — see the Games column for the sample behind each row.
| Team | Pos | Pld | Pts | GD | Form | Form rank | Form vs pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frem | 11 | 30 | 36 | -12 | LWDWL | 8 | +3 |
| Amager | 15 | 29 | 14 | -48 | LLLLL | 15 | 0 |
Form rank = league-wide rank by points from the last 5 league games; "Form vs pos" > 0 means over-performing the table.
Figures computed from the GioScore results database · data cutoff: kickoff 2009-06-01
On the table this was a mismatch: Frem (11th, 36 pts) held a 22-point advantage over Amager (15th, 14 pts). Against a league average of 1.61 goals per team per game, Frem ran at 1.37 scored and 1.77 conceded, Amager at 0.83 and 2.48.
Defeat had followed defeat for Amager — 12 in succession. Recent form was uneven: 10/15 points for Frem, 0/15 for Amager.
Half-time and full-time told different stories: it was 0-0 at the break, before 3 more goals closed it at 3-0.
