| Team | Games | Run | Unbeaten | Winless | Scored in | Conceded in | Last-5 pts | Last-5 goals |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hashtag United W | 15 | W1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 6/15 | 14-12 |
| AFC Wimbledon Ladies W | 15 | W1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 7/15 | 9-12 |
Computed over each team's finished games before kickoff — see the Games column for the sample behind each row.
| Team | Pos | Pld | Pts | GD | Form | Form rank | Form vs pos |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hashtag United W | 9 | 22 | 22 | -5 | LLLWD | 9 | 0 |
| AFC Wimbledon Ladies W | 10 | 22 | 22 | -18 | LDLWD | 8 | +2 |
Form rank = league-wide rank by points from the last 5 league games; "Form vs pos" > 0 means over-performing the table.
Figures computed from the GioScore results database · data cutoff: kickoff 2026-04-26
Nothing between them on points: 22 each, with Hashtag United W 9th and AFC Wimbledon Ladies W 10th. Per game in the league, Hashtag United W were scoring 1.59 and conceding 1.82, AFC Wimbledon Ladies W 1.36 and 2.18, against a competition average of 1.91 goals per team per game.
On the scoreboard, it was 1-1 at the break; 2 second-half goals set the final 2-2.
